Citizens of Yonkers fighting to restore capital projects cut in their Council Districts have taken their fight to the internet.
In what may be a first for Yonkers, residents of northeast Yonkers, led by Taffy Williams of the Crestwood Civic Association, have begun an “on-line” petition drive to demand that the City Council majority restore a much needed watermain project to the Capital Budget.
The project which was slated for this Spring and Summer was cut by a 5-2 vote of the Council last month. The project was to have been done in conjunction with another watermain project being done by United Water of New Rochelle in the same location. By combining the projects, the City would have saved substantial money and lessened the impact on the neighborhood. By delaying the project, the eventual cost will be substantially greater and the streets will have to be opened twice.
Councilmember Dee Barbato and I have been working closely with the Mayor and the citizens to restore the projects to the budget. However, the internet petition takes the battle to a new high-tech level.
Grassroots community activism has been on the rise for several years in Yonkers. Together with other citizen led efforts such as YonkersTV.blogspot.com, an on-line petition is the next logical step in empowering citizens and giving them a direct voice.
The petition can be found by searching “water main” and “Yonkers City Council” on the website www.thepetitionsite.com.
Monday, March 19, 2007
MAYOR PROPOSES COMMON SENSE SOLUTION TO CAPITAL BUDGET IMPASSE
Councilmember Dee Barbato and I have been working closely with Mayor Amicone and community leaders to restore funding for safety projects cut out of the recent capital budget. The Mayor recently proposed a sensible solution to the impasse with the Council majority. Councilmember Barbato and I fully support the Myor's recommendation
In a Memorandum dated March 16, 2007 Deputy Mayor Bill Regan outlined a proposal which would allow the Administration to begin planning and design work for two flood control projects and new a watermain in the Crestwood neighborhood. These projects were all cut out of the Budget by a 5-2 vote of the City Council earlier this year.
The flood control projects involve work at “Troublesome Brook” and Underhill Street. The watermain project would be done in conjunction with a project already being done by United Water of New Rochelle and would, therefore, save the City substantial money over the long term. Under the proposal from Mayor Amicone, Capital Budget amendments would be adopted now so that planning and design could begin, with the understanding that bonding authority would be passed this summer in the FY 2007-2008 budget year.
Councilmember Barbato and I have been working daily with the Mayor and Homeowners Groups throughout Northeast Yonkers in order to restore the project cuts. We applaud the Mayor’s proposal as a sensible resolution which will address these critical safety and quality of life projects in a timely and cost-effective manner.
In a Memorandum dated March 16, 2007 Deputy Mayor Bill Regan outlined a proposal which would allow the Administration to begin planning and design work for two flood control projects and new a watermain in the Crestwood neighborhood. These projects were all cut out of the Budget by a 5-2 vote of the City Council earlier this year.
The flood control projects involve work at “Troublesome Brook” and Underhill Street. The watermain project would be done in conjunction with a project already being done by United Water of New Rochelle and would, therefore, save the City substantial money over the long term. Under the proposal from Mayor Amicone, Capital Budget amendments would be adopted now so that planning and design could begin, with the understanding that bonding authority would be passed this summer in the FY 2007-2008 budget year.
Councilmember Barbato and I have been working daily with the Mayor and Homeowners Groups throughout Northeast Yonkers in order to restore the project cuts. We applaud the Mayor’s proposal as a sensible resolution which will address these critical safety and quality of life projects in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
PUT THE MONEY BACK!
One month ago, a majority of my Council colleagues voted to transfer $350,000 that was earmarked to pay the costs of administering election in order to instead fund a political hiring spree in the Council offices. Disingenously, they transferred the money within the City Clerk's office in order to avoid a technical violation of the City Charter. But the intended result was to be the same. More political cronies on the taxpayer's dime.
The theory advanced was that under a State Law adopted last year, the County was now paying election costs so the money in our budget was no longer needed for that purpose. Of course, this also ignores the possibility of either rebating the money to the taxpayers or otherwise using it to cut costs, for example by spending it to retire debt. However, it also ignored the plain language of the State statute which said that after the County paid for the election, it had the right to bill the municipalities. At the time, I investigated that issue and was told by both the County Board of Elections and the County Executive's office that such a charge back was under consideration.
On that basis, Councilwoman Dee Barbato and I urged our colleagues to hold off on any transfer until the issue was clarified. Of course, we also urged them to use the money, if at all, for such cost cutting as outlined above. Ignoring our warnings, the Council voted 5-2 to take the money for both new hires and for "printing costs" in the Council President's office (i.e."Newsletters").
This past Thursday, the City was advised in writing by the County Executive that the proposed County Budget included a bill to Yonkers for nearly $300,000 in election costs. This amount doesn't include the Special Election held two weeks ago so the cost will, presumably, rise. Unfortunately, the letter was a day late because on Thursday the State Comptroller approved the budget transfer. Had the Comptroller's office had the benefit of the County Executive's letter he no doubt would have vetoed the move.
Noentheless, the Council still can do the right thing. In Friday's Journal News, Council President Lesnick said none of the money had been spent yet. Good! Then do the right thing. Put the money back where it was and don't waste the taxpayer's hard earned dollars. Councilwoman Barbato and I will be proposing legislation to do just that in the coming weeks.
The theory advanced was that under a State Law adopted last year, the County was now paying election costs so the money in our budget was no longer needed for that purpose. Of course, this also ignores the possibility of either rebating the money to the taxpayers or otherwise using it to cut costs, for example by spending it to retire debt. However, it also ignored the plain language of the State statute which said that after the County paid for the election, it had the right to bill the municipalities. At the time, I investigated that issue and was told by both the County Board of Elections and the County Executive's office that such a charge back was under consideration.
On that basis, Councilwoman Dee Barbato and I urged our colleagues to hold off on any transfer until the issue was clarified. Of course, we also urged them to use the money, if at all, for such cost cutting as outlined above. Ignoring our warnings, the Council voted 5-2 to take the money for both new hires and for "printing costs" in the Council President's office (i.e."Newsletters").
This past Thursday, the City was advised in writing by the County Executive that the proposed County Budget included a bill to Yonkers for nearly $300,000 in election costs. This amount doesn't include the Special Election held two weeks ago so the cost will, presumably, rise. Unfortunately, the letter was a day late because on Thursday the State Comptroller approved the budget transfer. Had the Comptroller's office had the benefit of the County Executive's letter he no doubt would have vetoed the move.
Noentheless, the Council still can do the right thing. In Friday's Journal News, Council President Lesnick said none of the money had been spent yet. Good! Then do the right thing. Put the money back where it was and don't waste the taxpayer's hard earned dollars. Councilwoman Barbato and I will be proposing legislation to do just that in the coming weeks.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
CHARTER COMMISSION RECONVENES
Tonight at City Hall Mayor Amicone swore in the Charter Revision Commission. Most members returned although two new members joined the Commission. To learn more click on the link to the City of Yonkers web site on the left hand side of this page and then read the Mayor's press release.
CRESTWOOD COMMUNITY MEETING ON UNITED WATER PROJECT
On Monday night February 27 at 7:30 p.m. Councilwoman Dee Barbato and I will be sponsoring our second community meeting to update Crestwood residents regarding the upcoming United Water watermain project which is set to begin this Spring on Schultz Field and St. Elenora's Lane. Please join us for the update and to ask questions. For more information call Marie in the Council office at 377-6315.
Friday, February 16, 2007
FRIENDS AND SUPPORTERS
CAMPAIGN KICK OFF
Please Join us
Thursday March 1, 2007
at the Olde Stone Mill
2 Scarsdale Rd. Yonkers
7 -9 p.m.
$99 per person
UPCOMING EVENTS
2/19/07-HOLIDAY City Hall Closed
2/20/07-Zoning Board Council Chamber 6 p.m.
Council Rules Committee, Council Conf. Rm. 6:30 p.m.
Municipal Operations Comm. Council Conf. Rm. 7 p.m.
2/22/07-Mayor's Town Hall mtg. at Will Library 7-8 p.m.
2/20/07-Zoning Board Council Chamber 6 p.m.
Council Rules Committee, Council Conf. Rm. 6:30 p.m.
Municipal Operations Comm. Council Conf. Rm. 7 p.m.
2/22/07-Mayor's Town Hall mtg. at Will Library 7-8 p.m.
Friday, February 2, 2007
UPCOMING EVENTS: Feb 2-11. 2007
February 5, 2007 - Real Estate Committee Meeting (Downtown Project/ TIF Financing), 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers
February 6, 2007 - Community Services Committe Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Conference Room
Febuary 7, 2007 - Planning Board Meeting, 5:30 p.m. Council Chamber
Community Meeting on Palmer Road Met Life Bldg. Redevelopment, 7:00 p.m., Will Library
February 10, 2007 - Boy Scouts of America, Anniversary of Scouting Breakfast, 8:30 a.m., Most Holy Trinity Church, Yonkers (Info.: 773-1135 x231)
February 6, 2007 - Community Services Committe Meeting, 6:00 p.m. Conference Room
Febuary 7, 2007 - Planning Board Meeting, 5:30 p.m. Council Chamber
Community Meeting on Palmer Road Met Life Bldg. Redevelopment, 7:00 p.m., Will Library
February 10, 2007 - Boy Scouts of America, Anniversary of Scouting Breakfast, 8:30 a.m., Most Holy Trinity Church, Yonkers (Info.: 773-1135 x231)
Sunday, January 28, 2007
"COMMUNITY FIRST" NOW BLOGGING
The dedicated citizens at the Community First Development Coalition have been helping to bring Yonkers' diverse citizenry and neighborhoods together since 2005. Community First has been instrumental in uniting neighbors across Yonkers to lobby for better government, sensible development and citizen participation. Now Community FIrst is on line at www.communityfirstdevelopmentcoalition.blogspot.com. Give them a visit and see what these community activists are doing for Yonkers.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
SPRING SEASON FOR YONKERS' VINECUTTERS

Organized by Park Hill resident Terry Joshi, a dedicated band of citizens meets monthly at the intersection of the Saw Mill River Parkway and Rumsey Road for a litter and debris clean up and to cut the intrusive vines that constantly threaten native plants. The "vinecutters" meet for two hours on a Saturday morning and anyone is welcome to help out by giving as much or as little time as they can spare. Age and experience are no matter as the team will train a newcomer. Upcoming dates are Saturdays January 27, March 10, April 21 and May 19 from 10 a.m. to noon. For more information or to get involved feel free to call my City Hall office.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
CITY COUNCIL SPENDING MONEY IT DOESN"T HAVE
The City Council Last night voted 5-2 (Murtagh and Barbato disenting)to transfer $350,000 in money budgeted for election expenses to salary lines for hiring of additional Council staff. The council's action is the worst sort of pork barrel politics but also potentially leaves the City with a substantial unfunded exposure.
At issue is a vote by Council President Chuck Lesnick and a majority of the Council to transfer $350,000 previously budgeted for the cost of administering elections, to fund a hiring spree of new political appointments in the Council President’s office and the City Clerk’s office. The latter office is also controlled by the Council. The majority is justifying its spending by claiming that under a new State law, the County of Westchester will now pay the election costs previously paid by the City. However, the Council majority failed to do the necessary investigation and had they done so would understand that the City will still be paying the election expenses in question. The 2005 Election and Consolidation Improvement Act specifically provides that the Counties may charge back election expenses to the municipalities after the fact and based on the conversations I have had with officials at both the Board of Elections and in the County Executive’s office, all indications are that Westchester County fully intends to do so. My colleagues on the Council, in a rush to beef up their own power base are risking leaving the City with a substantial unfunded liability.
At a meeting with municipal officials on October 19, 2006, County Executive Spano and his staff advised local officials that they had the discretion under the new state law to pass along the expenses and were considering doing so. If the County Legislature does what it is expected to do, Yonkers will shortly be handed a six figure bill that it cannot pay due to the actions of the City Council.
Councilwomen Dee Barbato and I had previously urged our colleagues not to transfer the funds to their own use simply because it was a waste of taxpayer’s dollars. Now having investigated the law, it is clear that it is not only wasteful but risks potentially leaving the City exposed to a substantial liability.
At issue is a vote by Council President Chuck Lesnick and a majority of the Council to transfer $350,000 previously budgeted for the cost of administering elections, to fund a hiring spree of new political appointments in the Council President’s office and the City Clerk’s office. The latter office is also controlled by the Council. The majority is justifying its spending by claiming that under a new State law, the County of Westchester will now pay the election costs previously paid by the City. However, the Council majority failed to do the necessary investigation and had they done so would understand that the City will still be paying the election expenses in question. The 2005 Election and Consolidation Improvement Act specifically provides that the Counties may charge back election expenses to the municipalities after the fact and based on the conversations I have had with officials at both the Board of Elections and in the County Executive’s office, all indications are that Westchester County fully intends to do so. My colleagues on the Council, in a rush to beef up their own power base are risking leaving the City with a substantial unfunded liability.
At a meeting with municipal officials on October 19, 2006, County Executive Spano and his staff advised local officials that they had the discretion under the new state law to pass along the expenses and were considering doing so. If the County Legislature does what it is expected to do, Yonkers will shortly be handed a six figure bill that it cannot pay due to the actions of the City Council.
Councilwomen Dee Barbato and I had previously urged our colleagues not to transfer the funds to their own use simply because it was a waste of taxpayer’s dollars. Now having investigated the law, it is clear that it is not only wasteful but risks potentially leaving the City exposed to a substantial liability.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
NEIGHBORS SPEAK OUT ON UNITED WATER PROJECT IN CRESTWOOD

Nearly 100 neighbors, concerned about the impact of the United Water waterline project, turned out last night (January 22)to voice their concerns at a meeting which I co-cponsored with Councilwoman Dee Barbato. Representatives of United Water as well as the Mayor's office were presnt to brief the homeowners and, more importantly, hear their concerns. Seperate meeting were held earlier the same day with homeowners immediately contiguous to the construction site and with representatives of Annunciation Church and School.
The project, which should begin by March, involves laying new water lines for the United Water Company to serve its customers in New Rochelle. United Water is mandated to do the work by New York State and has the right by law to do the construction necessary in Yonkers. However, as part of an agreement negotiated by the Mayor's office, United Water will also be making a $900,000 contribution to the Yonkers Parks Department as well as contributing $700,000 for and performing the installation of a seperate waterline to serve the Crestwood community ( Of course, this assumes the city portion of the funding is approved. See seperate post below regarding Council President Lesnick and the Capital Budget).
A number of residents expressed concerns over noise, traffic (particularly as it relates to Annunciation School and Church) and whether the construction would disturb rodents and other animal life in the nearby Schultz Field Park
The City Department Heads present and United Water left the meeting with a list of concerns to be addressed and will be scheduling further meetings to brief the community on agreed upon solutions and remediations.
Our office will be continuing to monitor the planning phase and will, of course, relay any concerns and complaints from constituents throughout the project.
Saturday, January 20, 2007
UPCOMING EVENTS
Monday January 22
7:30 p.m. - Public Hearing on Con Edison M-29 Transmission Line at Riverdale YM-YWHA, 5625 Arlington Avenue, Bronx, NY (More info at www.coned.com/publicissues/m29.asp)
7:00 p.m. - Community Briefing on United Water waterline project, Annunciation Church, Lower Church
Tuesday January 23
7:30 p.m. - City Council meeting to vote on amended Capital Budget (see post below for more information) City Council Chamber 4th Floor City Hall
Wednesday January 24
6:30 p.m. - Environmental Scoping Session for Downtown/ Waterfront project. City Council Chamber, 4th Floor City Hall
8:00 p.m. - City Council Real Estate Committee Meeting, Council Chamber, City Hall 4th Floor
7:30 p.m. - Public Hearing on Con Edison M-29 Transmission Line at Riverdale YM-YWHA, 5625 Arlington Avenue, Bronx, NY (More info at www.coned.com/publicissues/m29.asp)
7:00 p.m. - Community Briefing on United Water waterline project, Annunciation Church, Lower Church
Tuesday January 23
7:30 p.m. - City Council meeting to vote on amended Capital Budget (see post below for more information) City Council Chamber 4th Floor City Hall
Wednesday January 24
6:30 p.m. - Environmental Scoping Session for Downtown/ Waterfront project. City Council Chamber, 4th Floor City Hall
8:00 p.m. - City Council Real Estate Committee Meeting, Council Chamber, City Hall 4th Floor
LESNICK'S WAR ON NORTHEAST YONKERS: Council President playing politics with Capital Budget

This coming Tuesday night, January 23, Council President Chuck Lesnick has scheduled a vote on his proposed Amendment to the recently adopted Capital Budget. Lesnick has proposed amendments which target for elimination important safety projects in the Fifth and Sixth Council Districts. Under Lesnick's proposal, all other Council Districts would either be untouched or see their funding increased at the expense of residents in the Fifth and Sixth Districts.
The Capital Budget, which pays for major infrastructure, safety and quality of life projects, was adopted by the City Council only in December. This itself violates the City Charter and illustrates the irresponsibility of the current Council leadership and Budget Committee. By City Charter, the Capital Budget is to be adopted no later than June 1. However, the Council majority took no action for nearly six months, finally voting in mid-December to cut the Mayor's proposed budget by fifty per cent. Among the items they eliminated at that time were all funding for Traffic Safety including the installation of traffic lights at a major east side intersection which has been the scene of at least one pedestrian fatality. The only Councilmembers to vote against this ill-conceived, irresponsible action were Councilwoman Dee Barbato of the Sixth District and I.
It is no coincidence then that, Dee Barbato and I having bucked the Council President's political vendetta against the Mayor, he is now proposing further cuts but targeting only the Fifth and Sixth Council Districts. In other words, the Council President has decided that the residents and taxpayers of the Fifth and Sixth Districts will have to pay a price for electing politically independent Councilmembers.
Specifically, Council President Lesnick has proposed eliminating entirely three projects:
Watermain replacements in Crestwood
Drainage and flood control work on Underhill Street in Colonial Heights and
Flood control remediation on Fort Hill Road by Troublesome Brook
As Northeast Yonkers residents know, these projects are vital to the safety and quality of life of our neighborhoods. We all know the water pressure issues in Crestwood, the flooding on Underhill Street and down to the Asbury Church and many of us recall residents in the Fort Hill Road area being helped out in row boats during bad storms. Of course, when challenged at last Tuesday night's Council committee meeting, Lesnick said he did not know where the three projects he was cutting were located so apparently he is unfamiliar with our neighborhoods.
Needless to say, the Council President is not proposing to save the taxpayers a nickel. While cutting vital projects in the Fifth and Sixth Districts, he is increasing the funding for projects in the Districts of Councilmembers who are willing to vote with him and increasing funding for pet projects such as the privately run "Hudson River Museum".
On the same night, the Council President is also proposing to increase spending for salaries and expenses in his own office. While cutting projects in our neighborhoods, the Council President and his willing majority are planning on transferring $350,000 from elsewhere in the City's budget to hire more staff and political operatives in the Council President's office and the City Clerk's office.
Councilwoman Barbato and I both asked the Council President to at least insist on a Budget Committee meeting before the vote next Tuesday so that residents of the Fifth and Sixth District could be heard on these issues. Lesnick refused such a meeting and insisted that the matter simply go to a vote Tuesday night.
The only chance that residents and taxpayers of Northeast Yonkers will have to voice their outrage at being treated as second class citizens in Yonkers will be at the meeting itself Tuesday January 23 at 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be in the Council Chamber, 4th Floor City Hall. If you wish to speak that night you must call the City Clerk's office and sign up to speak on Tuesday. The Clerk's office is at 377-6020. If you cannot speak, I still urge you to attend the meeting and support your neighbors by your mere presence. I also urge you to let the Council President know how you feel. Contact Lesnick at chuck.lesnick@cityofyonkers.com or by calling 377-6060.
The Council President needs to be reminded that he represents all of Yonkers and that he cannot make the residents of the Fifth and Sixth Districts the pawns in his political games.
Sunday, January 14, 2007
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
" Yes, if you want to say that I was a drum major, say that I was a drum major for justice. Say that I was a drum major for peace. Say that I was a drum major for righteousness. And all of the other shallow things will not matter. I won't have any money to leave behind. I won't have the fine and luxurious things in life to leave behind. But I just want to leave a committed life behind. And that's all I want to say. If I can help somebody as I pass along. If I can cheer somebody with a word or song, if I can show somebody he is traveling wrong, then my living will not be in vain..."
"The Drum Major Instinct". Sermon by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. 1968
"The Drum Major Instinct". Sermon by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. 1968
IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE DOWNTOWN/ WATERFRONT NOW ON-LINE

The City of Yonkers website, which can be found at www.cityofyonkers.com, has the developer's initial scoping documents on line. Click on the "Bulletin Board" section on the main page for more information. The Environmental Scoping Session, your first real opportunity for input on this critical project, will be held Wednesday January 4, 2007 in the City Council Chamber, 4th Floor City Hall beginning at 6:30 p.m.
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT SCOPING SESSION SCHEDULED
The first environmental scoping session for the Downtown/ Waterfront project has been scheduled for January 24, 2007. The "scoping document" which will be created based upon the questions posed at this meeting will form the blueprint for the entire environmental study to follow. Public involvement is, therefore, critical at this meeting. The meeting will be in the City Council Chamber, fourth floor City Hall beginning at 6:30 p.m. For more information visit www.cityofyonkers.com or www.sfcyonkers.com.
REGIONAL COOPERATION WILL SAVE TIME AND MONEY AND LEAD TO BETTER PLANNING
Last evening, the Yonkers City Council signed off on the settlement of the lawsuit brought last year by the Town of Greenburg and its Villages challenging the environmental studies done in connection with the proposed Ridge Hill Village project. There were no surprises in the Greenburg lawsuit. The issues raised were exactly the issues, most notably traffic mitigation, which Greenburg and the other surrounding communities (as well as many in Yonkers) had been raising for three years. Unfortunately, those issues were largely ignored by those who argued that Yonkers should not concern itself with the impact that Ridge Hill, the largest development in Westchester County history, would have on its neighbors.
The resulting lawsuit led to months of further delay in the construction of Ridge Hill as well as significant costs to the City of Yonkers in legal and other fees. In settling the lawsuit, Greenburg and its villages have secured direct funding from the developer for further traffic mitigation but, more importantly, Yonkers, Greenburg and the developer have agreed to cooperate in the creation of a regional task force to study, plan and lobby for additional traffic mitigation off of the Sprain Brook Parkway. In a nutshell, the settlement does exactly what community activists in Yonkers and Greenburg as well as Councilwoman Dee Barbato and I had advocated from the get go: cooperation to address cross-border concerns and make the project better for all.
In recent years, Southern Westchester has witnessed municipal "border wars" time and again as one community or another planned a major project that would directly and unavoidably impact its neighbors. Proposals to bring IKEA to New Rochelle, new retail to Sanford Boulevard on the Mt. Vernon-Pelham border, the Stew Leonards/ Home Depot development and Ridge Hill itself have all raised similar issues and more than once resulted in litigation. There is a better way.
The Task Force established under the Ridge Hill settlement can serve as a model for cooperative and preemptive regional planning. The simple mechanism of a permanent inter-municipal Task Force which can meet, as needed, to address concerns as projects are planned would do much to nip border disputes in the bud. Such a group would streamline the development process and result in better development in the end. A Task Force need not require any municipality to cede authority or control over its own planning process. Rather it would simply serve as a forum for concerns to be heard and vetted. Likewise, as with the proposed Ridge Hill Task Force, it would allow the municipalities which participate to bring their combined talents and resources to lobby other levels of government, whether in Albany or Washington, for necessary assistance.
In a word, inter-municipal cooperation is just plain common sense.
The resulting lawsuit led to months of further delay in the construction of Ridge Hill as well as significant costs to the City of Yonkers in legal and other fees. In settling the lawsuit, Greenburg and its villages have secured direct funding from the developer for further traffic mitigation but, more importantly, Yonkers, Greenburg and the developer have agreed to cooperate in the creation of a regional task force to study, plan and lobby for additional traffic mitigation off of the Sprain Brook Parkway. In a nutshell, the settlement does exactly what community activists in Yonkers and Greenburg as well as Councilwoman Dee Barbato and I had advocated from the get go: cooperation to address cross-border concerns and make the project better for all.
In recent years, Southern Westchester has witnessed municipal "border wars" time and again as one community or another planned a major project that would directly and unavoidably impact its neighbors. Proposals to bring IKEA to New Rochelle, new retail to Sanford Boulevard on the Mt. Vernon-Pelham border, the Stew Leonards/ Home Depot development and Ridge Hill itself have all raised similar issues and more than once resulted in litigation. There is a better way.
The Task Force established under the Ridge Hill settlement can serve as a model for cooperative and preemptive regional planning. The simple mechanism of a permanent inter-municipal Task Force which can meet, as needed, to address concerns as projects are planned would do much to nip border disputes in the bud. Such a group would streamline the development process and result in better development in the end. A Task Force need not require any municipality to cede authority or control over its own planning process. Rather it would simply serve as a forum for concerns to be heard and vetted. Likewise, as with the proposed Ridge Hill Task Force, it would allow the municipalities which participate to bring their combined talents and resources to lobby other levels of government, whether in Albany or Washington, for necessary assistance.
In a word, inter-municipal cooperation is just plain common sense.
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
COUNCIL MAJORITY ACTS IRRESPONSIBLY ON CAPITAL BUDGET
The City Council Budget Committee met last night to "consider" the Mayor's proposed amendment to the Capital Budget adopted by the Council last month. The Committee and a majority of Council members continue to act irresponsibly in regard to the Capital Budget doing a disservice to the city and endangering the health and welfare of its residents.
Some background is necessary. The Capital Budget, as opposed to the Operating Budget, includes those major projects necessary for repairs and improvements to the city infrastructure and city services which are not funded by day to day operating revenue. For example, the current Capital Budget includes money for road resurfacing, vehicle replacement and equipment for the Police and Fire Departments. Unfortunately, the Capital Budget has traditionally been used as a political football by those looking to undermine a sitting Mayor. Cutting necessary capital projects has been a favorite tool of more than one politically ambitious Councilmember ever since then Councilman John Spencer sought to undermine the first strong Mayor, Terry Zaleski.
Currenly, the Budget Committee is chaired by Councilmember Liam McLaughlin and includes Councilmembers Robertson. Both are at odds with Mayor Amicone and both are said to be harboring Mayoral ambitions. In fact, Councilman Robertson has already declared for Mayor. Councilman McLaughlin and his fellow Committee members have used their position to both stall and slash the current Capital Budget proposal without any regard for the best interests of the City. They have been joined in their actions by Councilmember Annabi another who has designs on the second floor of City Hall.
Proof of the political gameplaying is in the numbers...not the budget numbers but the schedule of meetings held over at least the last six months. By quick calculation, since June 1, 2006 the City Council has held at least 54 meetings either as a full Council or in its various committees. Of those, at best five were Budget Committee meetings and of those, only two, in November and December, directly related to the current Capital Plan. Indeed, between June 2 and the second week of November, McLaughlin's committee did not hold a single meeting to discuss the Capital Proposal.
Now to the two meetings held. At the November meeting, the committee spent about an hour reviewing the Capital Budget with Capital Projects Director Tom Weibrecht. At the meeting's conclusion, Weibrecht left with a list of follow up questions from Councilmembers. Committee members and Councilmembers heard nothing more for a month. Then we learned that the Mayor's office had sent the Budget chair a response to the Committee's questions in less than two weeks but he had never shared the response with any other Councilmember. When found out, McLaughlin claimed the response did not answer the questions. Of course, other Councilmembers were never afforded an opportuntiy to judge for themselves.
Finally, on a mere twenty-four hours notice, McLaughlin called a Budget Committee meeting for December 12 and a Special Council meeting was called by a compliant Council President for the same night. With little notice to the public, no substantive discussion and no public input, five of seven Councilmembers (all but Councilwoman Barbato and I) voted to cut all but the Police and Fire lines by fifty per cent. Indeed, even Police and Fire only survived the knife due to last minute lobbying by union leaders in the Chamber that night.
To his credit, the Mayor has called the majority's bluff. Rather than veto its irresponsible action, the Mayor has accepted their "Budget" and immediately sent up an amendment restoring the cuts. Now the majority will again have to decide whether to do its job or ignore its responsibility and endanger the citizens of Yonkers for political purposes.
At last night's Budget Meeting over fifty members of the voting public were in attendance. Not one rose in support of the irresponsible majority. Every speaker called upon the Council to do its job, actually take a hard look at the budget and restore those programs necessary for quality of life and safety. Amen to that.
Now lets see if politics continues to triumph or whether Councilmembers, most notably the Council President, will finally choose to do the job with which they were entrusted.
Some background is necessary. The Capital Budget, as opposed to the Operating Budget, includes those major projects necessary for repairs and improvements to the city infrastructure and city services which are not funded by day to day operating revenue. For example, the current Capital Budget includes money for road resurfacing, vehicle replacement and equipment for the Police and Fire Departments. Unfortunately, the Capital Budget has traditionally been used as a political football by those looking to undermine a sitting Mayor. Cutting necessary capital projects has been a favorite tool of more than one politically ambitious Councilmember ever since then Councilman John Spencer sought to undermine the first strong Mayor, Terry Zaleski.
Currenly, the Budget Committee is chaired by Councilmember Liam McLaughlin and includes Councilmembers Robertson. Both are at odds with Mayor Amicone and both are said to be harboring Mayoral ambitions. In fact, Councilman Robertson has already declared for Mayor. Councilman McLaughlin and his fellow Committee members have used their position to both stall and slash the current Capital Budget proposal without any regard for the best interests of the City. They have been joined in their actions by Councilmember Annabi another who has designs on the second floor of City Hall.
Proof of the political gameplaying is in the numbers...not the budget numbers but the schedule of meetings held over at least the last six months. By quick calculation, since June 1, 2006 the City Council has held at least 54 meetings either as a full Council or in its various committees. Of those, at best five were Budget Committee meetings and of those, only two, in November and December, directly related to the current Capital Plan. Indeed, between June 2 and the second week of November, McLaughlin's committee did not hold a single meeting to discuss the Capital Proposal.
Now to the two meetings held. At the November meeting, the committee spent about an hour reviewing the Capital Budget with Capital Projects Director Tom Weibrecht. At the meeting's conclusion, Weibrecht left with a list of follow up questions from Councilmembers. Committee members and Councilmembers heard nothing more for a month. Then we learned that the Mayor's office had sent the Budget chair a response to the Committee's questions in less than two weeks but he had never shared the response with any other Councilmember. When found out, McLaughlin claimed the response did not answer the questions. Of course, other Councilmembers were never afforded an opportuntiy to judge for themselves.
Finally, on a mere twenty-four hours notice, McLaughlin called a Budget Committee meeting for December 12 and a Special Council meeting was called by a compliant Council President for the same night. With little notice to the public, no substantive discussion and no public input, five of seven Councilmembers (all but Councilwoman Barbato and I) voted to cut all but the Police and Fire lines by fifty per cent. Indeed, even Police and Fire only survived the knife due to last minute lobbying by union leaders in the Chamber that night.
To his credit, the Mayor has called the majority's bluff. Rather than veto its irresponsible action, the Mayor has accepted their "Budget" and immediately sent up an amendment restoring the cuts. Now the majority will again have to decide whether to do its job or ignore its responsibility and endanger the citizens of Yonkers for political purposes.
At last night's Budget Meeting over fifty members of the voting public were in attendance. Not one rose in support of the irresponsible majority. Every speaker called upon the Council to do its job, actually take a hard look at the budget and restore those programs necessary for quality of life and safety. Amen to that.
Now lets see if politics continues to triumph or whether Councilmembers, most notably the Council President, will finally choose to do the job with which they were entrusted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
